<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beckenham.id.au/2004/05/does-australia-have-a-free-pre.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.beckenham.id.au/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.beckenham.id.au,2007://5/tag:scrambler.chopdesign.com,2004://5.139-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Does Australia Have A Free Press...?</title>
  <subtitle>I was just another expat in Shanghai</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:scrambler.chopdesign.com,2004://5.139</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beckenham.id.au/2004/05/does-australia-have-a-free-pre.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.beckenham.id.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=5/entry_id=139" title="Does Australia Have A Free Press...?" />
    <published>2004-05-18T23:54:16Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-02T07:23:37Z</updated>
    <title>Does Australia Have A Free Press...?</title>
    <summary> It appears the Australian Government likes regulating what had normally been &apos;free press&apos; areas. I believe the best comment on the Howard Government&apos;s latest backdoor attempt at press censorship is Bill Leak&apos;s (left). I first became aware of this...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tim</name>
      <uri>http://www.beckenham.id.au</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Opinions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.beckenham.id.au/">
      <![CDATA[<div class="floatimgleft">
<a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,345509,00.jpg"  target="_blank">
<img title="Bill Leak Cartoon" alt="Bill Leake Cartoon 0,1658,345509,00.jpg" src="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,345509,00.jpg" width="150 /"> 
</a>
</div> 
It appears the Australian Government likes regulating what had normally been 'free press' areas. I believe the best comment on the Howard Government's latest backdoor attempt at press censorship is Bill Leak's (left). I first became aware of this outrage when watching ABC TV's <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/" target="_blank">Media Watch</a>.
<br style="clear: both;"/>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>For the uninitiated, MediaWatch is a weekly media commenting show on the ABC.  They take the role of a media watchdog, but also provide views on media rights, responsibilities and ethics.  The show in my opinion allows the average Aussie a snippet view into the workings of the Australian press &amp; its interactions (and influences) with Australian society.  Anyway, back to the topic...</p>

<blockquote>
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1105289.htm" >Ashmore Off Limits - ABC Media Watch 10/05/04</a>

<p>Canberra wants everybody up in the Australian tropics, to stay right where they belong ‚Äì particularly boat people and journalists.</p>

<p>In early March this year, when a boat load of Indonesians was found dumped on Ashmore Reef, there was a posse of press on a Customs boat only a few hours away raring to get at the story. </p>

<p>One of them, The Australian‚Äôs Nicolas Rothwell, sensed there might be problems. <br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>For the full transcript of the show, follow the above link...</p>

<p>It really raises questions about this Government's manipulation of the media.  We have already saw them win an election riding on the back of boat-people villifed for wanting a better life.  But with the treatment of these people in places like the Port Headland Detention Centre, perhaps Australian's these days are more sympathetic to their plight.  I hope this is the case.  Maybe this is why they tried to keep it under wraps.  The Government's previous policies has limited their maneouverability on this issue.</p>

<p>Does this mean the average Australian public's reaction to border protection and illegal immigration issues has changed dramatically since 2001/2002?  Have we become more complacent to these issues, or are we more sympathetic to these people's plight?  I hope so.  And this might be the case.  The Howard Government must have a firm opinion on this.  In my opinion, in past election's the Coalition relied on 1 card trick election policies (Backlash against Keating, Post-September 11 fears, Pork-barrelling of the Baby-Boomers).  I think the public are much more aware of this after the 3rd occassion. I believe the Howard Government policy is that the public don't need a reminder on how they were manipulated back before the last election. Hence their attempts at keeping this winter's refugee wave under wraps.  Plus I think they are quite happy that young families (last 2 years first home owners - social engineering?) are set up to exploit this time around.</p>

<p>This is getting a little too much even for me.  But I guess this is what blogs are for.</p>

<p>(I hear the people coming for me now.... better log off...)  ;)</p>

<p><br style="clear: all;"/></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
